Which statement about reclaimed water is supported by the material?

• A. Spray heads are the best choice for reclaimed water due to low risk of clogging
• B. Water cannons are recommended for reclaimed water to prevent debris
• C. Check valves are unnecessary with reclaimed water
• D. Rotors can pass the majority of debris found in reclaimed water sources without clogging

Answer: (D)

Reclaimed water carries more solids and debris, so the irrigation design must prioritize components that handle this contaminant load without clogging. Rotors tend to have larger flow paths and less reliance on tiny emitter openings compared with spray heads, making them more tolerant of debris in reclaimed-water systems. When paired with proper filtration to remove finer particles, rotors can pass the majority of debris without clogging, which is why this option best fits the scenario. The other ideas don’t align with typical reclaimed-water practices: spray heads clog more easily due to small orifices, backflow-prevention requirements mean check valves aren’t optional, and water cannons aren’t specifically chosen to address debris issues in reclaimed water.